Home > Case Studies > Search > Case Study Search > Search Results >
Accessible Bus Service through New Design Standards. Grenoble (France)
Background & Objectives
Making the bus service in Grenoble as accessible as a comparable modern tram service is a challenging task because of the lack of track guidance for buses, as opposed to trams, which makes it difficult for bus drivers to minimize the horizontal gap between the entry area of the vehicle and the bus stop.
The municipal transportation service of Grenoble has undertaken research for almost 20 years in order to set design standards for making bus stops accessible to motor-impaired people that are most effective.
A similar service exists in Merseyside (UK).
The design standards are, among others, a breadth of the boarding platform of at least 2.1m, a height of the kerb of 21cm and a gradient of the access ramps at the end of the platform of at most three percent. The 21cm measure is a compromise between reducing the gap between bus and stop surface on the one hand, and minimizing the risk of damaging anything when approaching the stop (e.g. when a bus stop is in a bus bay) on the other. If the bus driver then activates the kneeling mechanism, passengers have almost no vertical step to take.
When a new kerbside stop is built, which means a boarding area that extends into the roadway, a height of 24 cm can be used because the bus approaches parallel to the platform so that there is no risk of collision between the vehicle and kerb. Another advantage of this type of bus stop is that it is easier for the driver to minimize the horizontal gap.
But even these infrastructure arrangements fail to make the bus service fully accessible for people with motor impairments. To address this issue the transportation service has installed powered ramps, which are 65cm long with a maximum gradient of 15% in the extended situation, that allow wheelchair users to easily enter the bus.
For people with visual impairments there is a safety line in a high contrast colour (to the surroundings) 60cm back from the front edge of the boarding area.
In many other towns manual ramps are installed, but the powered one has the advantage of fast deployment and the driver not having to leave his cabin, which means that he does not have to apply the handbrake, turn the engine off and close the cash box and the cabin door. All of these activities obviously take a lot of time, meaning that manual ramps have a negative effect on timekeeping.
Link for further information:
International Association of Public Transport (UITP) / European Conference of Ministers of Transport (ECMT): Improving Access to Public Transport, Paris (2004), pp. 17-18
Downloadsguide_access1.pdf (2171 kByte)
guide_access2.pdf (3368 kByte)
Related Case Studies
Guide for Improving the User-Friendliness of Information Services in Public Transport in Finland
Handbike Rental in Warsaw (Poland)
Ambassadors and Accessibility Trips, Docklands Light Rail, London, UK
Modernisation of Kiev Metro
Mobile Internet Service Especially for Blind People in Germany
BAIM - Information for People with Reduced Mobility in the Field of Public Transport, Frankfurt, DE
Independent Travel Training Package in Warrington (UK)
Minibuses for people with reduced mobility in Brno, Czech Republic
Transport to access health care at Callaghan House, Rochdale
Access for mobility impaired people in Burgos/Spain
People Mover - Combination of Elevator and Bridge to Access Platforms in Berlin (Germany)
Mobility and the elderly: a complex issue (Belgium)
Internet Information Service for Mobility-Reduced Persons in Paris (France)
Talking Sign System RNIB React in Portsmouth (UK)
Disabled Assistance Centre to Serve Travel Needs of Impaired Customers in Italy
Public transport ambassadors in Breda, Netherlands
Green Park Step-Free access
Train the Trainer in Frankfurt/Main, Germany
Mobility Training for People with Motor Impairment in Berlin (Germany)
Kolla - the accessible-to-all public transport system, GĂ¶teborg, Sweden
Mobility Information for erlderly people in Thun/Switzerland
St Helens Central Station (Merseyside) - Regeneration Study
Command Set for People with Visual and Hearing Impairments in Dresden (Germany)
Accessibility of Public Transport for all Passengers in London (UK)
Fully accessible tram and bus stops in Poznan, Poland
Public transport-related training for older people in Krakow, Poland
Accessible Emergency and Information Pillars at Regional Railway Stations in Hamburg (Germany)
Barrier-Free FLIRT Train and Train Station in Wetter (Germany)
Promoting Accessible Buses and Raising Awareness to Children in Helsinki (Finland)
Tactile Relief Models and the Touch and Sound Atlas in Paris (France)
NOPPA - Navigation and Guidance System for the Blind in Finland
Supporting mobility for older generations in Thun, Switzerland
Accessible Light Rail Transit System in Dublin (Ireland)
Internet courses for senior citizens in Munich, Germany
A2B Dial-a-bus, Aberdeenshire, Scotland
Acoustic Underground Orientation System POPTIS in Vienna (Austria)
PatenTicket: Peer-to-Peer Marketing of Public Transport to Older People in Cologne, Germany
Booklet about Accessible Customer Service in Public Transport in Finland
Accessible Local Transport with a Guidance System for Visually Impaired People in Munich (Germany)
Prague's public transport upgrades for people with mobility difficulties
Underground with Special Features for Mobility-Reduced People in Copenhagen (Denmark)
"Seniors Train Seniors" initiative, Offenbach am Main (Germany)
Public Transport Training in Munich, Germany
Explore your City - guidebook and tours in Salzburg, Austria
Introduction of the Label â€śBarrier-Freeâ€ť to State Accessible Facilities in Berlin (Germany)
This Case Study is part of the European urban mobility and transport best practice collection from Eltis - www.eltis.org.